Do Kwon could serve prison in both US and South Korea, prosecutor says

8 June 2023

Cointelegraph By Arijit Sarkar

South Korean prosecutor Dan Sunghan says Kwon’s extradition to South Korea makes more sense but adds that the Terraform Labs co-founder could also serve time in the United States as well.

News

Join us on social networks

Terraform Labs co-founder and CEO Do Kwon may be subject to multiple sentences in the United States and South Korea, according to a senior South Korean prosecutor heading the investigation.

It is understood that Kwon is currently serving house bail in Montenegro after having his bail proposal granted by a Montenegro court on June 5. Both Kwon and Terraform Labs’ chief financial officer, Han Chang-Joon, are legally required to reside at Chang-Joon’s legal residence in Montenegro while a decision about extradition is made.

Speaking to Bloomberg, Dan Sunghan revealed that Kwon’s extradition to South Korea made better sense “when it comes to bringing justice or recovering the damages for victims.”

South Korean senior prosecutor Dan Sunghan speaking about the possibility of Kwon facing multiple sentences across the U.S. and South Korea. Source: Bloomberg

According to Sunghan, most of the basic investigation around the collapse of the Terra ecosystem was done in South Korea. He further claimed local authorities have access to more evidence when compared to their American counterparts.

“The most efficient way to get justice is to have the investigation and trial take place in South Korea.”

Sunghan also stressed the fact that South Korean authorities have already indicted a number of Kwon’s co-conspirators.

However, when asked about the possibility of Kwon having to face a trial in both the U.S. and South Korea, Sunghan believed “such a scenario is an option.” A convict is subject to multiple cross-border sentences when they are yet to be prosecuted for some of the crimes in one of the jurisdictions, he explained.

Thus, Sunghan said if South Korean authorities don’t account for all the crimes Kwon is charged with within the U.S., then the entrepreneur could potentially be sent to the US for prosecution after serving his sentence in South Korea — which could be over 40 years alone.

The prosecutor expects Kwon’s sentence to be “the longest sentence ever handed down in South Korea.” Kwon’s cold wallet, which supposedly contains 10,000 Bitcoin (BTC), remains untraceable.

Sunghan confirmed that authorities can see funds being moved from the wallet in question. However, the location of the wallet and the process used to withdraw the funds remains a mystery.

“This is the largest financial fraud or financial securities fraud case that has ever happened in South Korea,” said Sunghan.

JUST IN: #DoKwon has been released on bail once again after Montenegro court dismisses prosecution appeal pic.twitter.com/zOlpLqU17S

— Crypto Rand (@crypto_rand)

June 5, 2023

Kwon was held by Montenegro authorities on March 23 after he was caught trying to fly out of the country using fake documents. Soon after, both the U.S. and South Korean authorities requested his extradition to their respective countries. According to South Korean prosecutor Dan Sunghan, some extradition requests can take up to nine months for processing.

Related: South Korea passes bill to make officials disclose Bitcoin holdings

Meanwhile, South Korean authorities have started reviewing Binance’s acquisition deals in the country after the crypto exchange got into a legal battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

A local report suggests that South Korea’s financial watchdog — the Financial Service Committee — is reviewing Binance’s acquisition of local crypto trading platform Gopax.

In its review of the Gopax deal, the FSC pointed out that Binance’s alleged securities law violations and requests from the SEC to freeze Binance.US assets make it difficult to accept the acquisition request at this point.

  

You might also like

South Carolina dismisses its staking lawsuit against Coinbase, joining Vermont  
South Carolina dismisses its staking lawsuit against Coinbase, joining Vermont  

South Carolina has become the latest US state to dismiss its lawsuit against crypto exchange Coinbase over its staking services, which had accused the crypto exchange of offering unregistered securities.The lawsuit was officially dismissed in a joint stipulation between the crypto exchange and the South Carolina Attorney General’s securities division on March 27.“South Carolina just joined Vermont to dismiss its unfounded staking lawsuit against Coinbase,” the firm’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, said in a March 27 X post.“This is not just a victory for us, but for American consumers and we hope it’s a sign of things to come in the few states left that restrict staking.”South Carolina Attorney General and Coinbase’s joint stipulation. Source: South Carolina Attorney GeneralSouth Carolina and Vermont were two of 10 US states that took legal action against Coinbase’s staking services on June 6, 2023 — the same day that the federal securities regulator filed its lawsuit against the crypto exchange.The Securities and Exchange Commission officially dismissed that lawsuit on Feb. 27, 2025.The other eight US states that filed enforcement action similar to South Carolina were Alabama, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, Washington and Wisconsin. Grewal said he hoped to see other states follow suit, and that South Carolina residents lost an estimated $2 million in staking rewards as a result of the lawsuit.“The 52 million Americans who own crypto deserve commonsense consumer protections and clear rules,” he said. “We applaud South Carolina for standing up for justice and hope the remaining states with bans on staking will take notice.”South Carolina introduces Bitcoin reserve billMeanwhile, a state lawmaker has just introduced the “Strategic Digital Assets Reserve Act of South Carolina” on March 27, which could see the state treasurer allocate up to 10% of certain state funds to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC).Unlike most US state crypto reserve bills, North Carolina’s House Bill 4256, introduced by Rep. Jordan Pace, mentioned Bitcoin on several occasions for the Strategic Digital Assets Reserve that the bill seeks to establish.Source: Jordan PaceThe bill allows South Carolina’s treasurer, currently Curtis Loftis, to establish a Bitcoin reserve that exceeds no more than 1 million Bitcoin — a high ceiling that the US federal government is also looking to reach or exceed with its recently established Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.The treasurer would be able to add Bitcoin to South Carolina’s General Fund, the Budget Stabilization Reserve Fund any other investment fund that they manage.Related: Coinbase files FOIA to see how much the SEC’s ‘war on crypto’ costWhile no mention of stablecoins, non-fungible tokens, Ether (ETH) or any other crypto tokens was made, the House bill said the Strategic Digital Assets Reserve wouldn’t be limited to Bitcoin.According to Bitcoin Law, 42 Bitcoin reserve bills have been introduced at the state level in 19 states, and 36 of those 42 bills remain live.Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to create a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a Digital Asset Stockpile, both of which will initially use cryptocurrency forfeited in government criminal cases.Magazine: Comeback 2025: Is Ethereum poised to catch up with Bitcoin and Solana?

EU watchdog wants insurers’ crypto holdings 100% covered, citing volatility  
EU watchdog wants insurers’ crypto holdings 100% covered, citing volatility  

The European Union’s insurance authority has proposed a blanket rule that would mandate insurance firms to maintain capital equal to the value of their crypto holdings as part of a measure to mitigate risks for policyholders.The new proposal — made by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority in a Technical Advice report to the European Commission on March 27 — would set a far stricter standard than other asset classes, such as stocks and real estate, which don’t even need to be half-backed.“EIOPA considers a 100% haircut in the standard formula prudent and appropriate for these assets in view of their inherent risks and high volatility,” it said in a separate statement.Such a measure would fill a regulatory gap between the Capital Requirements Regulation and Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), EIOPA said, noting that the European Union’s regulatory framework for insurers currently lacks specific provisions on crypto assets.Circle argued in January that a blanket 100% stress factor on crypto assets didn’t account for lower-risk stablecoins. Source: Circle EIOPA outlined four options for the European Commission to consider — one: make no changes; two: mandate an 80% “stress level” to crypto assets; and three: mandate a 100% stress level to crypto asset. The stress level percentages determine how much capital firms need to hold to stay solvent.The fourth option called on the European Commission to consider the risks of tokenized assets more broadly.EIOPA said option three would be the most appropriate option.“An 80% stress to the value of crypto-asset exposures does not appear sufficiently prudent,” whereas “a 100% stress is more appropriate and aligns with one of the approaches to the transitional treatment of crypto-assets under CRR,” EIOPA said.The 100% stress refers to the assumption that the crypto asset prices could fall by 100% and that diversification — spreading the risk across different assets — wouldn’t not reduce this stress. EIOPA pointed out that Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) have fallen 82% and 91%, respectively, in the past.A 100% capital charge for crypto assets would reflect a far stricter approach compared to stocks, which range between 39% and 49%, and real estate, which incurs a 25% capital charge, according to solvency capital requirements laid out in the Commission Delegated Regulation 2015/35.EIOPA said a 100% capital charge for crypto asset-related (re)insurance undertakings shouldn’t be “overly burdensome” and that there would be no material costs for policyholders.“The capital requirements would fully capture the risk of crypto-asset with a positive impact on policyholder protection in case there are material exposures in the future.”Related: Tabit offers USD insurance policies backed by Bitcoin regulatory capitalEIOPA acknowledged that the share of crypto-asset (re)insurance undertakings accounts for just 655 million euros or 0.0068% of all undertakings in Europe — even referring to it as “immaterial.”“At the same time crypto assets are high risk investments which may result in total loss of value,” EIOPA said, explaining why it recommends option three.Luxembourg and Sweden could be hit hardest by the proposed ruleInsurers in Luxembourg and Sweden are likely to be the most affected, according to a Q4 2023 report cited by EIOPA, which found that these two countries accounted for 69% and 21% of all crypto asset-related exposures among (re)insurance undertakings.Ireland, Denmark and Liechtenstein also accounted for 3.4%, 1.4% and 1.2% of the undertakings. Most of these undertakings are structured within funds, such as exchange-traded funds, and held on behalf of unit-linked policyholders, EIOPA noted.Split of crypto-asset exposure proxy per European country in Q4 2023. Source: EIOPAEIOPA, however, acknowledged that a broader adoption of crypto assets in the future may require a more “differentiated approach.”Magazine: Crypto fans are obsessed with longevity and biohacking: Here’s why

SEC has officially closed its investigation into Crypto.com, CEO says  
SEC has officially closed its investigation into Crypto.com, CEO says  

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has officially closed its investigation into Crypto.com, with no action taken against the crypto exchange, according to the firm’s CEO, Kris Marszalek.It comes seven months after the SEC issued a Wells notice to the crypto platform in August, signaling its intention to take legal action against the firm.”They used every tool available to attempt to stifle us, restricting access to banking, auditors, investors, and beyond. It was a calculated attempt to put an end to the industry,” Marszalek said in a March 27 X post.The SEC’s investigation into https://t.co/pFc4Pz9nFR has been closed with no action being taken against https://t.co/pFc4Pz9nFR.— Kris | Crypto.com (@kris) March 27, 2025”The fact that we not only persevered but became stronger is a testament to our vision and the community supporting it. Onwards!”Crypto.com filed a lawsuit against the SEC in October, accusing the Gary Gensler-led commission of overstepping its authority and taking a “misguided” approach to crypto regulation.This is a developing story, and further information will be added as it becomes available.

Open chat
1
BlockFo Chat
Hello 👋, How can we help you?
📱 When you've pressed the BlockFo button, we automatically transfer to WhatsApp 🔝🔐
🖥️ Or, if you use a PC or Mac, then we'll open a new window to load your desktop app.
BlockFo
BlockFo